Compare liquidity provision with holding after impermanent loss, estimated fees, incentives, and transaction costs.
Position assumptions
Initial deposit value
$
Entry price
$
Exit or scenario price
$
Income and costs
Time in pool
days
Trading-fee APR
%
Incentive APR
%
Total entry, exit, gas, and rebalance costs
$
Income uses a simple APR estimate
Enter observed or conservative assumptions. Actual fees depend on volume, active liquidity, routing, price path, and time spent inside the range.
Modeled LP result versus holdingFull range
+$61.97
$12,500.00 holding benchmark$12,561.97 modeled LP value
Impermanent loss
-2.02%
Estimated fees
$295.89
Estimated incentives
$98.63
Break-even combined APR
13.49%
Return breakdown
Liquidity position
Hold benchmark
Difference
Liquidity position
Hold benchmark
Difference
Position before income
$12,247.45
$12,500.00
-$252.55
Fees and incentives
$394.52
$0.00
$394.52
Entered costs
-$80.00
$0.00
-$80.00
Final modeled value
$12,561.97
$12,500.00
$61.97
The model values the second token as the quote currency, assumes a constant-product pool, and applies fee and incentive APR to the initial deposit without compounding. Concentrated-liquidity results use the selected range but do not model the complete price path, changing pool liquidity, token emissions, slippage, taxes, or protocol risk.